In 2023, the Indian legal system witnessed one of its most significant reforms in recent history. Along with the introduction of new criminal laws—the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita—the government also replaced the colonial-era Indian Evidence Act, 1872, with a new and modern legislation called the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. This new law is designed to bring India’s evidence procedures in line with today’s digital and technological realities.
Read this: Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023
Let’s understand what this new law means, why it was introduced, and how it affects the way evidence is treated in Indian courts today.
What is the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, and why was it introduced?
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 is the updated law that governs what can be accepted as evidence in Indian courts. It replaces the Indian Evidence Act of 1872, which was written during British colonial rule. Over the years, the old law became outdated, especially as technology and communication methods evolved.
This new Act was introduced to make the rules of evidence more suitable for modern times. It recognizes digital and electronic records as a core part of legal proceedings. It also simplifies many complex provisions from the older law, aiming to make justice quicker and more efficient.
How is it different from the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?
The differences between the old Evidence Act and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam are quite significant. One of the main changes is the inclusion of digital records and electronic communication as formal evidence. The new law also removes many outdated terms and references from colonial times, replacing them with language that is relevant to present-day India.
Another important difference is the structure. The new law is more concise and clearly categorized, making it easier for legal professionals and even common citizens to understand. It also gives more clarity on issues like the burden of proof, the role of expert witnesses, and the reliability of electronic records.
How does the new law deal with electronic records and digital evidence?
In the digital age, people use emails, messages, and cloud-based platforms more than paper documents. Recognizing this shift, the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam now treats digital records such as emails, CCTV footage, WhatsApp chats, and audio recordings as valid and admissible forms of evidence.
But accepting digital records is not as simple as just showing a screenshot or video. The law also emphasizes the need for proving that the record is authentic, unaltered, and legally obtained. For example, metadata, hash values, timestamps, and audit trails help establish that the evidence hasn’t been tampered with.
What are the rules for admitting electronic records under this Act?
The law lays down specific guidelines for how electronic evidence should be presented in court. For example, electronic documents must be accompanied by a certificate confirming that the data was taken from a reliable source, and that it was not modified.
This certificate helps the court presume the genuineness of the document. Without it, digital evidence may not be admitted unless it can be otherwise verified. The goal is to maintain a balance between accepting new forms of communication and ensuring that only credible evidence is used in court decisions.
What is the definition of “evidence” under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023?
The law defines “evidence” broadly to include both statements made before the court and documents submitted during trial. Importantly, it clearly includes electronic and digital records in its definition.
Evidence is divided into a few main types:
- Oral evidence: Things spoken by witnesses in court.
- Documentary evidence: Traditional documents like contracts, reports, or letters.
- Electronic records: Digital files like emails, texts, photographs, or videos.
- Expert evidence: Opinions from specialists such as forensic experts, doctors, or IT analysts.
This expanded definition reflects the realities of how people communicate and do business today.
What changes have been made to the burden of proof and legal presumptions?
One of the most important aspects of any trial is determining who needs to prove what. This is known as the burden of proof. Under the new law, the rules for burden of proof are more clearly laid out.
There are also new presumptions built into the law. For example, the court may assume that an electronic record certified in the proper manner is authentic unless proven otherwise. This shifts the burden to the other side to disprove its reliability.
Such changes make the process more efficient while still protecting the rights of both parties.
How does the law treat expert evidence now?
The new law strengthens the role of expert witnesses, especially in areas like digital forensics, DNA testing, and handwriting verification. In today’s world, many crimes involve technical aspects such as computer networks or encrypted messages. Experts help the court understand these complex topics.
For example, a forensic expert may be called to explain how a video was verified, or a cyber specialist might demonstrate how a particular file was recovered from a damaged hard drive. The Act ensures that expert opinions are respected and evaluated properly.
What is the role of oral and documentary evidence under the new law?
Oral evidence still plays a key role in trials. A person’s direct statement in court, when given under oath, carries significant weight. However, the new law emphasizes that oral evidence must be direct and not based on hearsay.
Documentary evidence now includes both physical and digital formats. Whether it’s a printed letter or an email, the court will consider it if it meets the conditions of admissibility. The law also maintains the distinction between primary evidence (original documents or records) and secondary evidence (copies or summaries), giving priority to original sources wherever possible.
How is relevancy of facts decided under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023?
Not all information is useful in a trial. The law focuses only on those facts that are relevant to the case. Relevance is determined by whether a fact is connected to the issue being decided by the court.
The new law refines these rules by including provisions for modern contexts. For instance, it allows for the relevance of communications sent through messaging apps, or the presence of a person at a location verified through mobile tower data.
By doing so, the law ensures that courts focus on facts that truly matter and contribute to justice.
How does the Act make modern forms of communication more reliable in court?
With the rise of smartphones and internet-based messaging, the law had to evolve to recognize these as legitimate and trustworthy sources of evidence. The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam achieves this by giving legal recognition to various digital formats like:
- Emails and online messages
- Video and voice recordings
- Social media conversations
- Cloud storage and server logs
- CCTV footage
It also provides legal presumptions in favor of the authenticity of such records when presented with proper verification. This shift allows for quicker trials and helps the judiciary deal with modern crimes more effectively.
Conclusion
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 is more than just a legal update. It represents a modern legal approach that understands how technology has changed the way people communicate and live. By adapting to digital tools, strengthening rules around evidence, and removing outdated procedures, this Act moves India’s justice system into the 21st century.
It not only benefits lawyers and judges but also makes the legal process more transparent and easier to understand for ordinary citizens. In the long run, this reform is expected to make trials more efficient and decisions more reliable—ultimately supporting the goal of fair and speedy justice for all.And if you want to know all chapter in Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 Clicked here
